Find the latest Class Action Lawsuits and Settlements here that has no proof of purchase requirement!
In this post, we will list out all of the Best Class Action Lawsuit Settlements that require no proof of purchase, receipts, etc.
Please remember to submit your claim ONLY if you qualify for settlement funds to receive free coupons, cash payments, and other means of reimbursement.
When submitting a claim, you are then eligible for cash payment as compensation whenever a company has decided to settle a class action lawsuit.
In order to submit a claim, you must fill out and file a claim form to receive compensation. Apply for these class action lawsuits and claim your settlement funds if you qualify.
Editor’s Note: Make sure you qualify for the class action lawsuit before you file a claim. For a full list of class action lawsuits, see our post on the best class action lawsuits.
*CAL is another way that we refer to Class Action Lawsuits*
How to File Claim for Class Action Lawsuits
- Step One: Find Products You Purchased
- Take a look of our list to find open settlements for products you may have purchased. Find out what the estimated payout will be and if proof of purchase is needed. Figure out if it’s worth your time to follow through. Most no receipts needed can be a few minutes of your time.
- Step Two: Fill Out the Claim Form
- Click through to the settlement claim form and fill out online. Simply provide the necessary info such as your name and address, products information you purchased, and then submit your claim.
- Step Three: Get your Check in the Mail
- They will mail your check once to the address your provided once your claim has been approved. Most claims checks are mailed 1-2 months after the claims period closes.
No Proof Required Class Action Lawsuit Settlements
MLB Minor League Player Pay Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who participated in the California League for at least seven days between Feb. 7, 2010, and Aug. 25, 2022, participated in spring training, instructional leagues or extended spring training in Florida between Feb. 7, 2009, and Aug. 25, 2022, or in Arizona between Feb. 7, 2011, and Aug. 25, 2022, while signed to a Minor League uniform player contract before signing a Major League uniform player contract. You may be eligible for a potential award from the MLB Minor League Player Pay Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 27, 2022
- Who’s Eligible:
- Individuals who:
- Participated in the California League for at least seven days between 02/07/2010 – 08/25/2022,
- Participated in spring training, instructional leagues or extended spring training in Florida between 02/07/2009 – 08/25/2022 or
- in Arizona between 02/07/2011 – 08/25/2022, while signed to a Minor League uniform player contract before signing a Major League uniform player contract
- Individuals who:
- Case Name & Number: Senne v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, Case No. 3:14-00608-JCS, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
See MLB Minor League Player Pay Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
General Electric Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who received a notification from General Electric warning them their information may have been compromised in a February 2020 data breach. You may be eligible for a potential award from the General Electric Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 22, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Consumers who received a notification from General Electric warning them their information may have been compromised in a February 2020 data breach
- Case Name & Number: Data Breach Litigation, Case No. 1:20-cv-02903-KPF, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
See General Electric Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Oakland County, Michigan, Foreclosure Taxes Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who formerly owned property in Oakland County, Michigan; who had their property foreclosed due to unpaid taxes; whose property was sold at tax auction for more than the amount necessary to cover unpaid taxes, interest, penalties and fees; and who did not receive a refund for surplus auction amounts between June 8, 2009, and July 17, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Oakland County, Michigan, Foreclosure Taxes Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 15, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who formerly owned property in Oakland County, Michigan; who had their property foreclosed due to unpaid taxes; whose property was sold at tax auction for more than the amount necessary to cover unpaid taxes, interest, penalties and fees; and who did not receive a refund for surplus auction amounts between June 8, 2009, and July 17, 2020.
- Case Name & Number: Bowles et al v. County of Oakland et al., Case No. 20-12838, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
See Oakland County, Michigan, Foreclosure Taxes Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Ron’s Staffing Fingerprint Time Clock Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who worked for Ron’s Staffing in Illinois and scanned their fingers between Dec. 3, 2014, and Nov. 1, 2019. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Ron’s Staffing Fingerprint Time Clock Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 26, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who worked for Ron’s Staffing in Illinois and scanned their fingers between Dec. 3, 2014, and Nov. 1, 2019.
- Case Name & Number: Devose v. Ron’s Staffing Services Inc, Case No. 2019-L-1022, in the Circuit Court for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Will County, Illinois
See Ron’s Staffing Fingerprint Time Clock Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Medicredit Robocalls Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who received a robocall from Medicredit that used an artificial or prerecorded voice between Dec. 16, 2017, and July 7, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Medicredit Robocalls Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 6, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who received a robocall from Medicredit that used an artificial or prerecorded voice between Dec. 16, 2017, and July 7, 2022. Calls that qualify for the settlement contain a “WD” designation and an “MC” and/or “MD” notation in Medicredit’s records.
- Case Name & Number: Miles v. Medicredit Inc., Case No. 4:20-cv-1186-JAR, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
See Medicredit Robocalls Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
James Franco Studio 4 Film School Enrollment, Tuition Fraud Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who took any courses at Studio 4 Film School in Los Angeles or New York between Feb. 1, 2014, and Sept. 20, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the James Franco Studio 4 Film School Enrollment, Tuition Fraud Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 4, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who took any courses at Studio 4 Film School in Los Angeles or New York between Feb. 1, 2014, and Sept. 20, 2022.
- Case Name & Number: Tither-Kaplan & Gaal et al. v. Studio 4 et al., Case No. 19STCV35156, in the Los Angeles Superior Court
See James Franco Studio 4 Film School Enrollment, Tuition Fraud Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Rushmore Loan Management Services Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits Massachusetts residents who received two or more phone calls from Rushmore Loan Management Services within a seven-day period between March 30, 2017, and Oct. 19, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Rushmore Loan Management Services Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: November 28, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Massachusetts residents who received two or more phone calls from Rushmore Loan Management Services within a seven-day period between March 30, 2017, and Oct. 19, 2021. According to the settlement website, there are 3,706 class members included in this definition.
- Case Name & Number: Kimberly Pueschel v. Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC, Case No. 2184CV00739, in the Superior Court for the County of Suffolk, Massachusetts
See Rushmore Loan Management Services Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Echo Global Logistics Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who worked for Echo Global Logistics in hourly or salaried sales roles during various periods based on the following criteria listed below. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Echo Global Logistics Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: November 21, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who worked for Echo Global Logistics in hourly or salaried sales roles during various periods based on the following criteria:
- California hourly salespeople: between 06/30/2018 – 06/30/2022
- California hourly salespeople: between 12/11/2015 – 06/30/2022
- Illinois hourly salespeople: between 06/30/2022 – 06/30/2022
- Illinois salaried salespeople between 12/11/2016 – 06/30/2022
- Hourly salespeople outside of California or Illinois between 06/30/2019 – 06/30/2022
- Salaried salespeople outside California or Illinois: between 12/11/2016 – 06/30/2022
- Case Name & Number: Cienega v Echo Global Logistics Inc, Case No. 22-cv-644, in the U.S. District for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division
See Echo Global Logistics Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
State Auto Underpaid Insurance Claims Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits two state classes made up of individuals in Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee whose homes were insured by State Auto Property and Casualty Co., State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., State Auto Insurance Co. of Ohio, Milbank Insurance Co. or Meridian Security Insurance Co. You may be eligible for a potential award from the State Auto Underpaid Insurance Claims Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 8, 2022
- Who’s Eligible:
- The first class is made up of individuals in Mississippi whose homes were insured by State Auto Property and Casualty Co., State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., State Auto Insurance Co. of Ohio, Milbank Insurance Co. or Meridian Security Insurance Co. and who made a structural damage claim for their property between April 2, 2017, and Feb. 16, 2021, that resulted in an actual cash value less nonmaterial depreciation which caused the payment to be under the applicable deductible.
- The second class is made up of individuals in Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee whose homes were insured by State Auto Property and Casualty Co., State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., State Auto Insurance Co. of Ohio, Milbank Insurance Co. or Meridian Security Insurance Co. and who made a structural damage claim for their property that resulted in an actual cash value less nonmaterial depreciation that caused the payment to be under the applicable deductible under an insurance policy with a one-year suit limitation between April 2, 2019, and Feb. 16, 2021, or an insurance policy with a two-year suit limitation between April 2, 2018, and Feb. 16, 2021.
- Case Name & Number: Gupta, et al. v. Aeries Software Inc., Case No. 8:20-cv-00995-FMO-ADS in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
See State Auto Underpaid Insurance Claims Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Sea Mar Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals whose private information was compromised in the Sea Mar Community Health Centers data breach that occurred between December 2020 and March 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Sea Mar Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 30, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals whose private information was compromised in the Sea Mar Community Health Centers data breach that occurred between December 2020 and March 2021.
- Case Name & Number: Jeffrie Allan Summers II v. Sea Mar Community Health Centers, Case No. 2-2-00773-7-SEA in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County
See Sea Mar Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
DirecTV Unsolicited Calls Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who received phone calls from DirecTV or from iQor Inc., Credit Management LP, AFNI Inc. or Enhanced Recovery Co. Inc. regarding a debt owed to DirecTV despite not being a DirecTV customer at any time since Oct. 1, 2004. You may be eligible for a potential award from the DirecTV Unsolicited Calls Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 19, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who received phone calls from DirecTV or from iQor Inc., Credit Management LP, AFNI Inc. or Enhanced Recovery Co. Inc. regarding a debt owed to DirecTV despite not being a DirecTV customer at any time since Oct. 1, 2004.
- Case Name & Number: Jenny Brown v. DIRECTV LLC, Case No. 2:13-cv-01170 in the District Court for the Central District of California
See DirecTV Unsolicited Calls Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Boohoo, PrettyLittleThing, Nasty Gal Fake Sale Prices Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals in California who made purchases on the Boohoo website since April 9, 2016, on the PrettyLittleThing website since May 19, 2016, and/or on the Nasty Gas website since March 1, 2017. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Boohoo, PrettyLittleThing, Nasty Gal Fake Sale Prices Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: November 28, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals in California who made purchases on the Boohoo website since April 9, 2016, on the PrettyLittleThing website since May 19, 2016, and/or on the Nasty Gas website since March 1, 2017.
- Case Name & Number:
- Farid Khan v. Boohoo.com USA Inc, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-03332 GW, in the District Court for the Central District of California
- Haya Hilton v. Prettylittlething.com USA Inc, et al., Case No.: 2:20-cv-004658 GW, in the District Court for the Central District of California
- Olivia Lee v. NastyGal.com USA, Inc., et al., Case No.: 2:20-cv-004659 GW, in the District Court for the Central District of California
See Boohoo, PrettyLittleThing, Nasty Gal Fake Sale Prices Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Kronos Fingerprint Time Clocks Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who scanned their fingers on a Kronos-brand time clock at their job in Illinois between Jan. 18, 2014, and March 20, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Kronos Fingerprint Time Clocks Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 6, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who scanned their fingers on a Kronos-brand time clock at their job in Illinois between Jan. 18, 2014, and March 20, 2022. Eligible workers may have received a settlement notice in the mail or via email. Class members who are uncertain if their job uses a Kronos-brand system can contact the settlement administrator.
- Case Name & Number: Figueroa v. Kronos Inc, Case No. 1:19-CV-01306, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division
See Kronos Fingerprint Time Clocks Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Subaru Battery Drain Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits current and former owners and lessees of 2015-2020 Outback, 2015-2020 Forester, 2015-2020 Legacy, 2015-2020 WRX and 2019-2020 Ascent vehicles, excluding owners and lessees from Alaska or Hawaii. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Subaru Battery Drain Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: March 9, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Current and former owners and lessees of 2015-2020 Outback, 2015-2020 Forester, 2015-2020 Legacy, 2015-2020 WRX and 2019-2020 Ascent vehicles, excluding owners and lessees from Alaska or Hawaii
- Case Name & Number: Subaru Battery Drain Products Liability Litigation, Case No. 1:20-cv-03095-JHR-MJS in the District Court for the District of New Jersey
See Subaru Battery Drain Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Riot Games Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits current and former female employees and temp agency contractors who worked for Riot Games in California between Nov. 6, 2014, and Dec. 27, 2021. “Female” includes individuals who self-identify as female or those who have not identified a gender but have a “female-identifying name”. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Riot Games Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 5, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits current and former female employees and temp agency contractors who worked for Riot Games in California between Nov. 6, 2014, and Dec. 27, 2021. “Female” includes individuals who self-identify as female or those who have not identified a gender but have a “female-identifying name.”
- Case Name & Number: McCracken v Riot Games Inc, Case No. 18STCV03957 in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles
See Riot Games Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
LifeBridge Health Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals whose personal information was accessed during the LifeBridge data breach announced in May 2018. You may be eligible for a potential award from the LifeBridge Health Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: February 1, 2023
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals whose personal information was accessed during the LifeBridge data breach announced in May 2018
- Case Name & Number: Johnson, et al. v. LifeBridge Health Inc., Case No. 24-C-18-006801 in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland
See LifeBridge Health Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
IHOP Franchise Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits hourly employees of Harvest Hospitalities who worked for the company’s IHOP franchises in Pennsylvania between June 12, 2017, and Jan. 17, 2021; in New Jersey between Sept. 28, 2015, and Jan. 17, 2021; in Maryland between Sept. 28, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2021; or in Virginia between Sept. 28, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the IHOP Franchise Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: TBD
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits hourly employees of Harvest Hospitalities who worked for the company’s IHOP franchises in Pennsylvania between June 12, 2017, and Jan. 17, 2021; in New Jersey between Sept. 28, 2015, and Jan. 17, 2021; in Maryland between Sept. 28, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2021; or in Virginia between Sept. 28, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2021.
- Case Name & Number:
- Taylor Duke v. Harvest Hospitalities, Inc., et al., No. 2:20-cv-865-CCW, in the United States District Court Western District of Pennsylvania
- Morales, et al. v. Harvest Hospitalities, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-2482- JKB, in the United States District Court Western District of Pennsylvania
- Wilson, et al. v. Harvest Hospitalities, Inc., et al., No. 2:21-cv-4274-TJS, in the United States District Court Western District of Pennsylvania
- Royal, et al. v. Harvest Hospitalities, Inc., et al., No. 3:21-cv-17737-AETLHG, in the United States District Court Western District of Pennsylvania
See IHOP Franchise Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Avis Budget Electronic Toll Fees Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who rented an Avis or Budget vehicle and paid Avis, Budget or HTA — an electronic toll processing administrator — for the use of e-Toll services between April 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2015. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Avis Budget Electronic Toll Fees Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: February 28, 2023
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who rented an Avis or Budget vehicle and paid Avis, Budget or HTA — an electronic toll processing administrator — for the use of e-Toll services between 04/01/2007 – 12/31/2015
- Case Name & Number: Mendez v. Avis Budget Group Inc. et al., Case No. 2:11-cv-06537-CCC-JSA (D.N.J.) in the District Court for the District of New Jersey
See Avis Budget Electronic Toll Fees Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Santa Clara County Wrongful Detention Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits who were detained at the Santa Clara County Jail between April 26, 2018, and April 26, 2021, for a period of over 12 hours after the district attorney declined to prosecute them. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Santa Clara County Wrongful Detention Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: September 4, 2023
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who were detained at the Santa Clara County Jail between 04/26/2018 – 04/26/2021, for a period of over 12 hours after the district attorney declined to prosecute them
- Case Name & Number: Dylan Camarlinghi v. Santa Clara County, et al., Case No. 21-cv-03020-EJD (LB) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San José Division
See Santa Clara County Wrongful Detention Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
University of California Unlawful Late Fees Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits current and former students of the University of California system who were charged one or more late fees between Oct. 10, 2015, and Sept. 26, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the University of California Unlawful Late Fees Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: November 25, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Current and former students of the University of California system who were charged one or more late fees between 10/10/2015 – 09/26/2022
- Case Name & Number: Recinos et al. v. the Regents of the University of California, Case No. RG19038659, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Alameda
See University of California Unlawful Late Fees Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
ClearBalance Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits a nationwide class of individuals whose personal identifying information was compromised in the CSI Financial Services data breach between March 8 and April 26, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the ClearBalance Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: November 24, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits a nationwide class of individuals whose personal identifying information was compromised in the CSI Financial Services data breach between March 8 and April 26, 2021. The settlement also covers a subclass of class members who lived in California at the time of the data breach.
- Case Name & Number: Ivo Kolar v. CSI Financial Services LLC, Case No. 37-2021-00030426 in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Diego
See ClearBalance Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Missouri Department of Corrections (MDOC) Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals employed by MDOC in Corrections Officer I or Corrections Officer II positions between Aug. 14, 2007, and July 7, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Missouri Department of Corrections (MDOC) Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: 45 days after receiving payment to file a claim form to dispute the payment amount.
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals employed by MDOC in Corrections Officer I or Corrections Officer II positions between Aug. 14, 2007, and July 7, 2022. These employees may now be considered “Correctional Officers” or “Correctional Sergeants” under updated job titles. All prisons operated by MDOC are covered by the settlement.
- Case Name & Number: Thomas Hootselle, et al. v. Missouri Department of Corrections, Case No. t2A.C-CCoost8-ot, in the Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri
See Missouri Department of Corrections (MDOC) Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Monsanto Water Contamination Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits NPDES Phase I and II cities, towns, villages, boroughs, townships and independent port districts within a HUC 12 Watershed adjoining a 303(d) water body impaired by PCBs as of June 24, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Monsanto Water Contamination Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 17, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits NPDES Phase I and II cities, towns, villages, boroughs, townships and independent port districts within a HUC 12 Watershed adjoining a 303(d) water body impaired by polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as of June 24, 2020.
- Case Name & Number: City of Long Beach v. Monsanto Co., Case No. 2:16-CV-03493-FMO-AS, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Western Division
See Monsanto Water Contamination Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
DSL Extreme TrueSTREAM Internet False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who were false advertising to by DSL Extreme TrueSTREAM marketing their internet services as “fiber optic”. You may be eligible for a potential award from the DSL Extreme TrueSTREAM Internet False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 21, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Class members include consumers who meet the following criteria:
- Purchased at least one of the four TrueSTREAM internet services packages between March 1, 2015, and July 14, 2017:
- 7I 68 kb
- 1.5 mb
- 3.0 mb
- 6.0 mb
- Maintained a standard copper-based phone line with AT&T for the duration of the time they had the TrueSTREAM service or lived in an area serviced by the ADSL1
- Lived in one of the following area codes and had a phone line with said area code: 213; 310; 323; 408; 415; 424; 442; 510; 562; 619; 626; 628; 650; 657; 661; 669; 707; 714; 747; 805; 818; 831; 858; 909; 925; 949; or 951
- Purchased at least one of the four TrueSTREAM internet services packages between March 1, 2015, and July 14, 2017:
- Case Name & Number: Chinitz v. Telecom Evolutions, LLC, Case No. 18STCV08068, in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
See DSL Extreme TrueSTREAM Internet False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Ocala, Florida, Illegal Fire Service Fees Common Fund Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits in-city utility customers who paid the city of Ocala’s fire service fee between Feb. 20, 2010, and July 21, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Ocala, Florida, Illegal Fire Service Fees Common Fund Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: July 1, 2023
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers who received notification from Humana that their personal and health information was compromised in a data breach occurring between Oct. 12 and Dec. 16, 2020.
- Case Name & Number: Discount Sleep of Ocala, LLC d/b/a Mattress Warehouse v. City of Ocala, Florida, Case No. 2014 CA 000426, in the Circuit Court of the 5th Judicial Circuit in and for Marion County, Florida
See Ocala, Florida, Illegal Fire Service Fees Common Fund Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Anheuser-Busch Ritas False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased any Ritas products (margarita products, spritzers and more) between Jan. 1, 2018, and July 19, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Anheuser-Busch Ritas False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 16, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers who purchased any Ritas products (margarita products, spritzers and more) between Jan. 1, 2018, and July 19, 2022. A full list of included products is available on the settlement website.
- Case Name & Number: Browning, et al., v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-00889-SRB, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri
See Anheuser-Busch Ritas False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
PCS Revenue Control Systems Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers whose personal information was compromised in a PCS Revenue Control Systems data breach between May 19, 2017, and Dec. 19, 2019. You may be eligible for a potential award from the PCS Revenue Control Systems Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: November 23, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers whose personal information was compromised in a PCS Revenue Control Systems data breach between May 19, 2017, and Dec. 19, 2019. An estimated 867,2019 individuals are included under this class definition.
- Case Name & Number: Gamez, et al. v. PCS Revenue Control Systems Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-08991-JXN-AME in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, Newark Division
See PCS Revenue Control Systems Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Jame Roll Form Products Biometric Privacy Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who worked for Jame Roll Form Products LLC in Illinois between Aug. 19, 2016, and May 24, 2022, and whose biometric identifiers were collected through fingerprint scan time clocks without the employee giving written consent. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Jame Roll Form Products Biometric Privacy Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 1, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who worked for Jame Roll Form Products LLC in Illinois between Aug. 19, 2016, and May 24, 2022, and whose biometric identifiers were collected through fingerprint scan time clocks without the employee first giving written consent.
- Case Name & Number: Cruz v. Jame Roll Form Products, Case No. 2021CH04132 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois
See Jame Roll Form Products Biometric Privacy Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Ford Canada, California Vehicle Dealers Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased or leased certain makes of vehicles from a dealer in California between Jan. 1, 2001, and April 30, 2003, and who lived in California as of Nov. 15, 2010. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Ford Canada, California Vehicle Dealers Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 31, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers who purchased or leased certain make vehicles from a dealer in California between Jan. 1, 2001, and April 30, 2003, and who lived in California as of Nov. 15, 2010. Makes covered by the settlement are Acura, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Dodge, Ford, GMC, Honda, Hummer, Infiniti, Jaguar, Jeep, Land Rover, Lexus, Lincoln, Mazda, Mercury, Nissan, Oldsmobile, Plymouth, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn, Toyota and Volvo.the collateral protection insurance carrier or third-party collateral protection insurance administrator.
- Case Name & Number: Automobile Antitrust Cases I and II, JCCP Nos. 4298 and 4303, in the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco
See Ford Canada, California Vehicle Dealers Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Keurig ‘Recyclable’ K-Cups False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who purchased single-serving K-Cups labeled as recyclable between June 8, 2016, and Aug. 8, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Keurig ‘Recyclable’ K-Cups False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: January 9, 2023
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who purchased single serving K-Cups labeled as recyclable between June 8, 2016, and Aug. 8, 2022.
- Case Name & Number: Smith v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. Case No. 4:18-CV-06690-HSG in the District Court for the Northern District of California
See Keurig ‘Recyclable’ K-Cups False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Fairlife Milk Cow Mistreatment Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased Fairlife or Fair Oak Farms milk products on or before April 27, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Fairlife Milk Cow Mistreatment Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 27, 2022
- Who’s Eligible:The settlement benefits consumers who purchased Fairlife or Fair Oak Farms milk products on or before April 27, 2022. The settlement covers milk, ice cream, butter, yogurt and other dairy products from both Fairlife and Fair Oak Farms. A full list of included products is available on the settlement website.
- Case Name & Number: In re fairlife Milk Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, MDL No. 2909, Lead Case No. 1:19-cv-03924-RMD-MDW, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
See Fairlife Milk Cow Mistreatment Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits non-exempt employees of Vail Resorts Management Co. and worked primarily at one of its resort of mountain locations during an applicable class period. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: The settlement benefits non-exempt employees of Vail Resorts Management Co. and worked primarily at one of its resort of mountain locations during an applicable class period. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits non-exempt employees of Vail Resorts Management Co. and worked primarily at one of its resort of mountain locations during an applicable class period. Class periods vary depending on the state a Class Member worked in, as follows:
- For Class Members employed in Wyoming: Oct. 21, 2010, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in Indiana, Ohio, Washington, Minnesota, Vermont, New York, Michigan, Nevada, Wisconsin and Colorado: Oct. 21, 2014, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in Missouri: Oct. 21, 2015, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in California, Pennsylvania and Utah: Oct. 21, 2016, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in New Hampshire: Oct. 21, 2017, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members not employed in one of the above identified states: Oct. 21, 2016 to Oct. 23, 2021
- Case Name & Number: Hamilton v. Heavenly Valley, Limited Partnership, Case No. SC20210148, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of El Dorado
See Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
New Jersey Incarcerated Students with Disabilities IDEA Violations Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who were incarcerated in a New Jersey prison between Jan. 11, 2015, and Oct. 31, 2020 and met any of the following descriptions. You may be eligible for a potential award from the New Jersey Incarcerated Students with Disabilities IDEA Violations Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: January 31, 2024 (estimated)
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who were incarcerated in a New Jersey prison between Jan. 11, 2015, and Oct. 31, 2020 and met any of the following descriptions.
- Case Name & Number: Adam X. v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, Case No. 3:17-cv-00188-FLW-LHG, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
See New Jersey Incarcerated Students with Disabilities IDEA Violations Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
FPI Management Fees Class Action Lawsuit
For Washington residents who got charged a tenant screening fee or holding fee by FPI Management between April 16, 2016, and Oct. 13, 2021, then you are eligible for a potential award from the FPI Management Fees Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Class Members are Washington state residents who sent in a rental application to FPI Management between April 16, 2016, and Oct. 13, 2021, and paid a tenant screening fee through FPI to the owner of the property, paid a holding deposit through FPI to the property owner, or had a credit report pulled by FPI or another entity acting on its behalf.
- Case Name & Number: Brianna Morris v. FPI Management Inc., Case. No. 2:19-CV-00128-TOR, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
See FPI Management Fees Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Raydon ERISA Class Action Lawsuit
For every U.S. citizen who was a participant in or beneficiary of the Raydon Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan on or after Sep. 30, 2015, then you are eligible for a potential award from the Raydon ERISA Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Every U.S. citizen who was a participant in or beneficiary of the Raydon Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan on or after Sep. 30, 2015
- Case Name & Number: Woznicki v. Raydon Corporation et al., Case No. 6:18-cv-02090-WWB-GJK, in the U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida Orlando Division
See Raydon ERISA Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
McCormick All-Natural Products False Ad Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone in the United States, its territories, and districts who purchased certain McCormick all-natural products between Jan. 1, 2013, and Sept. 23, 2021. You are eligible for a potential award from the McCormick All-Natural Products False Ad Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: 90 days after the settlement receives final approval
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who purchased certain McCormick products labeled as “natural” or “all natural” between Jan. 1, 2013, and Sept. 23, 2021.
- Case Name & Number: Holve, et al. v. Mccormick & Co. Inc., Case No. 6:16-cv-06702 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York
See McCormick All-Natural Products False Ad Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
USAA Cost of Insurance Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who owns or owned Universal Life 1, Universal Life 2, Universal Life 3, and/or Universal Life 4 life insurance policies issued or administered by USAA Life, or its predecessors in interest, that were in force on or after March 1, 1999. You may be eligible for a potential award from the USAA Cost of Insurance Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who owns or owned Universal Life 1, Universal Life 2, Universal Life 3, and/or Universal Life 4 life insurance policies issued or administered by USAA Life, or its predecessors in interest, that were in force on or after March 1, 1999, subject to certain important exclusions. The estates of deceased individuals who would have been Class Members also are considered part of the Class.
- Case Name & Number: Spegele, et al. v. USAA Life Insurance Co., Case No. 5:17-cv-967-OLG in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
See USAA Cost of Insurance Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Duke University and UNC Faculty Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit all natural persons employed as a faculty member by Duke University or UNC Chapel Hill from Oct. 1, 2001, through Feb. 5, 2018. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Duke University UNC Faculty Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: All natural persons employed by Duke University or UNC Chapel Hill from Oct. 1, 2001, through Feb. 5, 2018, as a faculty member.
- Case Name & Number: Binotti, et al. v. Duke University, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-470 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
See Duke University UNC Faculty Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Neurobrands DL-Malic Acid Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit California residents who purchased the following Neurobrands products for household or personal use, not for resale, between Jan. 1, 2012, and Oct. 15, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Neurobrands DL-Malic Acid Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: California residents who purchased the following Neurobrands products for household or personal use, not for resale, between Jan. 1, 2012, and Oct. 15, 2020:
- NeuroSONIC Superfruit Infusion
- NeuroSONIC Orange Passion
- NeuroBLISS White Raspberry
- NeuroBLISS Citrus Berry
- NeuroBLISS Tropical Lychee
- NeuroPROTEIN Watermelon Mint
- NeuroPROTEIN Cherry Vanilla
- NeuroDAILY Tangerine Citrus
- NeuroGASM Passion Fruit
- Case Name & Number: Young, et al. v. Neurobrands LLC, Case No. 4:18-cv-05907-JSW in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
See Neurobrands DL-Malic Acid Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Intelenet America OT Wages Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who worked for Intelenet America LLC, now known as Teleperformance Business Services US LLC as an hourly home-based call center worker, including, but not limited to, agents, associates, call center representatives, and travel care professionals, at any point between Sept. 20, 2015, and June 21, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Intelenet America OT Wages Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible:
- The Class is defined as anyone who worked for Intelenet America LLC, now known as Teleperformance Business Services US LLC as an hourly home-based call center worker, including, but not limited to, agents, associates, call center representatives, and travel care professionals, at any point between Sept. 20, 2015, and June 21, 2021, or as an hourly call center worker in a brick-and-mortar call center, including, but not limited to agents, associates, call center representatives, and travel care professionals, at any point between Jan. 27, 2017, and June 21, 2021.
- The settlement definition of “At-Home Workers” does not include call center workers who work or worked from home temporarily or permanently due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the settlement’s definition of “Brick-And-Mortar Workers” does include call center workers who worked from home temporarily or permanently due to COVID-19.
- Case Name & Number: Jasmine C., et al. v. Intelenet America LLC, Case No. 2:18-cv-14052-MCA-JAD in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
See Intelenet America OT Wages Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Robert Heath Trucking Wages Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who is or was previously employed by Robert Heath Trucking in California as a truck driver and was paid piece rate by the mile between Aug. 30, 2015, and Sept. 1, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Robert Heath Trucking Wages Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who is or was previously employed by Robert Heath Trucking in California as a truck driver and was paid piece rate by the mile between Aug. 30, 2015, and Sept. 1, 2020
- Case Name & Number: Dianne S., et al. v. Robert Heath Trucking Inc., Case No. 19STCV30808 in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
See Robert Heath Trucking Wages Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Brenntag Profit Sharing Plan Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who participated in the plan at any point between Jan. 8, 2014, and April 8, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Brenntag Profit Sharing Plan Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who participated in the plan at any point between Jan. 8, 2014, and April 8, 2021 (the Class Period), including any beneficiary of a deceased person who participated in the plan at any time during that period and any alternate payee of a person subject to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order who participated in the plan at any point during that period.
- Case Name & Number: Buescher et. al v. Brenntag, et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-00147-JMG in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
See Brenntag Profit Sharing Plan Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
IBM 401(k) Plan Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who was a participant in or beneficiary of the IBM 401(k) Plus Plan at any time from January 21, 2014, through October 20, 2014. You may be eligible for a potential award from the IBM 401(k) Plan Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who was a participant in or beneficiary of the IBM 401(k) Plus Plan at any time from Jan. 21, 2014, through Oct. 20, 2014, and whose plan accounts included investments in the IBM Stock Fund.
- Case Name & Number: Larry J., et al. v. Retirement Plans Committee of IBM, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-03781-WHP in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
See IBM 401(k) Plan Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Wells Fargo Buydown Agreement Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit all residents of the United States who entered into buydown agreements with Wells Fargo in residential real estate mortgage transactions. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Wells Fargo Buydown Agreement Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: none
- Who’s Eligible: Two classes
- TILA Class: Anyone in the United States who entered into buydown agreements with Wells Fargo in residential real estate mortgage transactions within one year prior to the filing of the initial complaint.
- Breach of Contract Class: Anyone in the United States who, during the Class Period, entered into buydown agreements with Wells Fargo in residential real estate mortgage transactions.
- Case Name & Number: Alejandro Carrillo, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 2:18-cv-03095-SJF-SIL in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
See Wells Fargo Buydown Agreement Class Action Lawsuit Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Creative Ceilings Settles Wage Statement Class Action Lawsuit
For current and former Creative Ceilings Inc. employees in California who worked one or more pay periods between Dec. 20, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2020, you are eligible for a potential award from the Creative Ceilings Settles Wage Statement Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: N/A
- Who’s Eligible: Current and former Creative Ceilings Inc. employees in California who worked one or more pay periods between Dec. 20, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2020.
- Case Name & Number: Hector S., et al. v. Creative Ceilings Inc., et al., Case No. MSC19-02678 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Contra Costa
See Creative Ceilings Settles Wage Statement Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Terminix Alabama Price Increase Class Action Lawsuit
For individuals who were former and existing Terminix customers in Alabama who own a Terminix-serviced property, then you are eligible for a potential award from the Terminix Alabama Price Increase Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: There is no claim form deadline; however, the settlement fund will expire 12/01/2022.
- Who’s Eligible: Former and existing Terminix customers in Alabama
- Case Name & Number: State of Alabama v. The Terminix International Co. LP, et al., Case No. CV-2020-901368 in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama
See Terminix Alabama Price Increase Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Seterus Alleged Unlawful Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit
For homeowners in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania who received notices of debt and possible acceleration on their mortgage loans from Seterus, you are eligible for a potential award from the Seterus Alleged Unlawful Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: N/A
- Who’s Eligible: Homeowners in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania who received notices of debt and possible acceleration on their mortgage loans from Seterus between the applicable dates in each state.
- Case Name & Number: Koepplinger v. Seterus Inc., Case No. 1:17-cv-00995 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
See Seterus Alleged Unlawful Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Trojan Horse Retirement Plan Class Action Lawsuit
If you signed up for a 401(k) plan with Trojan Horse from Jan. 1, 2011 through Sept. 20, 2016 and fear that you and your loved ones may be taken advantage of, you are eligible for a potential award from the Trojan Horse Retirement Plan Class Action Lawsuit.
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Estimated Amount: Varies
- Case Name & Number: Longo, et al. v. Trojan Horse Ltd., et al., Case No. 5:13-cv-00418-BO, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
See our Trojan Horse Retirement Plan Class Action Lawsuit Review .
(Click the link above to file your claim)
Missouri Timeshare Closing Costs Lawsuit
For individuals that purchased a timeshare from Resort Sales Missouri Inc. or Spinnaker Resorts Inc on or after June 1, 2014, you are eligible for a potential award.
- Claim Form Deadline: The deadline to file a claim is 30 days after receiving a notice in the mail
- Estimated Amount: Varies, depending on the closing costs paid.
- Case Name & Number: Darrell and Kathleen Thompson v. Resort Sales Missouri Inc. and Spinnaker Resorts Inc., Case No. 1746-CC00203, in the Circuit Court of Taney County, Missouri
See our Missouri Timeshare Closing Costs Lawsuit Review
(Click the link above to file your claim)
Bottom Line
If you qualify for any of these class action lawsuit settlements, this is a great way to earn some extra cash and become reimbursed.
There are many class action lawsuit settlements available up to date, but these are generally available to the public and require no proof of purchase.
If you’re interested in more class action lawsuit settlements, see our full list of the Review.
Did you know you can earn free money from banks? Below are a few of the best banks offering the best bonuses:
- Huntington Bank Promotions
- Chase Bank Promotions
- TD Bank Promotions
- Discover Bank Promotions
- HSBC Bank Promotions
- CIT Bank Promotions
- For more of a variety, see our list of 1,000+ bank bonuses!
AccountThe post No Proof Required Class Action Lawsuit Settlements – November 2022 appeared first on Hustler Money Blog.