Find the latest Class Action Lawsuits and Settlements here that has no proof of purchase requirement!
In this post, we will list out all of the Best Class Action Lawsuit Settlements that require no proof of purchase, receipts, etc.
Please remember to submit your claim ONLY if you qualify for settlement funds to receive free coupons, cash payments, and other means of reimbursement.
When submitting a claim, you are then eligible for cash payment as compensation whenever a company has decided to settle a class action lawsuit.
In order to submit a claim, you must fill out and file a claim form to receive compensation. Apply for these class action lawsuits and claim your settlement funds if you qualify.
Editor’s Note: Make sure you qualify for the class action lawsuit before you file a claim. For a full list of class action lawsuits, see our post on the best class action lawsuits.
*CAL is another way that we refer to Class Action Lawsuits*
How to File Claim for Class Action Lawsuits
- Step One: Find Products You Purchased
- Take a look of our list to find open settlements for products you may have purchased. Find out what the estimated payout will be and if proof of purchase is needed. Figure out if it’s worth your time to follow through. Most no receipts needed can be a few minutes of your time.
- Step Two: Fill Out the Claim Form
- Click through to the settlement claim form and fill out online. Simply provide the necessary info such as your name and address, products information you purchased, and then submit your claim.
- Step Three: Get your Check in the Mail
- They will mail your check once to the address your provided once your claim has been approved. Most claims checks are mailed 1-2 months after the claims period closes.
No Proof Required Class Action Lawsuit Settlements
XTEND Workout Powders False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
Woodbolt agreed to pay $3 million to resolve a class action lawsuit claiming it falsely advertised XTEND workout powders as “0 calories.” Class members may claim up to $25 without proof of purchase.
Plaintiffs in the false advertising class action lawsuit accused Woodbolt of misleading customers by promising that XTEND products have “0 calories.” Despite these claims, supported by the Atwater calorie calculation method, testing of the products allegedly showed the products were not zero calories as promised.
- Who’s Eligible:
- The settlement benefits consumers who purchased certain XTEND products from Woodbolt or through third-party sellers, including Amazon, between July 28, 2014, and Jan. 24, 2023.
- Estimated Amount:
- $0.50 per purchased product — up to $50 total with proof of purchase or up to $25 total without proof of purchase.
- Proof of Purchase: No
- Receipts or other documentation of purchases are not required but can result in higher payments.
- Claim Form Deadline: 04/24/2023
- Case Name & Number:
- Metague, et al. v. Woodbolt Distribution LLC, Case No. 8:20- cv-02186-PX, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
- How to file a claim:
- Head over to the Claim Form.
- Read over the claim form to see if you are eligible.
- Complete the claim form with your info.
- Submit your claim form to receive your potential award!
See Class Action Lawsuit review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Wesson Oil False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
ConAgra Foods Inc. has agreed to a $3 million class action settlement resolving claims it falsely advertised certain Wesson oil products as “natural.”
The Wesson cooking oil products covered by the settlement are Wesson Vegetable Oil, Wesson Canola Oil, Wesson Corn Oil and Wesson Best Blend, all of which were marketed and sold as being “natural” during the applicable class periods.
- Claim Form Deadline: 05/22/2023
- Who’s Eligible:
- All natural persons living in one of 11 states who purchased Wesson oil products in that state for personal, noncommercial use. The class period for each of the states is as follows:
- California: June 28, 2007, through July 1, 2017
- Colorado: Jan. 12, 2009, through July 1, 2017
- Florida: Jan. 12, 2008, through July 1, 2017
- Illinois: Jan. 12, 2007, through July 1, 2017
- Indiana: Jan. 12, 2006, through July 1, 2017
- Nebraska: Jan. 12, 2008, through July 1, 2017
- New York: Jan. 12, 2008, through July 1, 2017
- Ohio: Jan. 12, 2010, through July 1, 2017
- Oregon: Jan. 12, 2006, through July 1, 2017
- South Dakota: Jan. 12, 2006, through July 1, 2017
- Texas: Jan. 12, 2010, through July 1, 2017
- The Wesson cooking oil products covered by the settlement are Wesson Vegetable Oil, Wesson Canola Oil, Wesson Corn Oil and Wesson Best Blend, all of which were marketed and sold as being “natural” during the applicable class periods.
- All natural persons living in one of 11 states who purchased Wesson oil products in that state for personal, noncommercial use. The class period for each of the states is as follows:
- Case Name & Number:
- In re: ConAgra Foods Inc., Case No. CV 11-05379-CJC (AGRx), MDL No. 2291, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
See Class Action Lawsuit review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Christopher’s Dodge Ram Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits females who, between Jan. 1, 2012, and July 14, 2022, applied for or expressed interest in a sales position at Cristopher’s Dodge Ram in Golden, Colorado, but were not hired or contacted, or who applied for a sales job but were steered into an administrative position upon being hired. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Christopher’s Dodge Ram Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: November 24, 2023
- Who’s Eligible: Females who, between 01/01/2012 – 07/14/2022, applied for or expressed interest in a sales position at Cristopher’s Dodge Ram in Golden, Colorado, but were not hired or contacted, or who applied for a sales job but were steered into an administrative position upon being hired
- Case Name & Number: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chris the Crazy Trader Inc. d/b/a Christopher’s Dodge Ram, Case No. 1:21-cv-02666, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
See Class Action Lawsuit review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Mid-America Taping & Reeling Fingerprint Timeclocks Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who used a Mid-America Taping & Reeling fingerprint-scan timekeeping system in Illinois on or after Oct. 23, 2013. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Mid-America Taping & Reeling Fingerprint Timeclocks Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: N/A
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who used a Mid-America Taping & Reeling fingerprint scan timekeeping system in Illinois on or after Oct. 23, 2013.
- Case Name & Number: Vega v. Mid-America Taping & Reeling Inc., Case No. 2019-CH-1136 in the Circuit Court of DuPage County, Illinois
See Class Action Lawsuit review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Uber ADA Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits Uber users who opted into Uber’s wait time fees waiver program for riders with disabilities by May 12, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Uber ADA Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: April 24, 2023
- Who’s Eligible: Uber users who opted into Uber’s wait time fees waiver program for riders with disabilities by May 12, 2022.
- Case Name & Number: United States of America v. Uber Technologies Inc, Case No. 3:21-CV-08735-WHA, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division
See Class Action Lawsuit review.
(Click here to file a claim)
IHOP Franchise Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits hourly employees of Harvest Hospitalities who worked for the company’s IHOP franchises in Pennsylvania between June 12, 2017, and Jan. 17, 2021; in New Jersey between Sept. 28, 2015, and Jan. 17, 2021; in Maryland between Sept. 28, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2021; or in Virginia between Sept. 28, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the IHOP Franchise Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: TBD
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits hourly employees of Harvest Hospitalities who worked for the company’s IHOP franchises in Pennsylvania between June 12, 2017, and Jan. 17, 2021; in New Jersey between Sept. 28, 2015, and Jan. 17, 2021; in Maryland between Sept. 28, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2021; or in Virginia between Sept. 28, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2021.
- Case Name & Number:
- Taylor Duke v. Harvest Hospitalities, Inc., et al., No. 2:20-cv-865-CCW, in the United States District Court Western District of Pennsylvania
- Morales, et al. v. Harvest Hospitalities, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-2482- JKB, in the United States District Court Western District of Pennsylvania
- Wilson, et al. v. Harvest Hospitalities, Inc., et al., No. 2:21-cv-4274-TJS, in the United States District Court Western District of Pennsylvania
- Royal, et al. v. Harvest Hospitalities, Inc., et al., No. 3:21-cv-17737-AETLHG, in the United States District Court Western District of Pennsylvania
See Class Action Lawsuit review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Santa Clara County Wrongful Detention Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits who were detained at the Santa Clara County Jail between April 26, 2018, and April 26, 2021, for a period of over 12 hours after the district attorney declined to prosecute them. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Santa Clara County Wrongful Detention Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: September 4, 2023
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who were detained at the Santa Clara County Jail between 04/26/2018 – 04/26/2021, for a period of over 12 hours after the district attorney declined to prosecute them
- Case Name & Number: Dylan Camarlinghi v. Santa Clara County, et al., Case No. 21-cv-03020-EJD (LB) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San José Division
See Class Action Lawsuit review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Missouri Department of Corrections (MDOC) Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals employed by MDOC in Corrections Officer I or Corrections Officer II positions between Aug. 14, 2007, and July 7, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Missouri Department of Corrections (MDOC) Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: 45 days after receiving payment to file a claim form to dispute the payment amount.
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals employed by MDOC in Corrections Officer I or Corrections Officer II positions between Aug. 14, 2007, and July 7, 2022. These employees may now be considered “Correctional Officers” or “Correctional Sergeants” under updated job titles. All prisons operated by MDOC are covered by the settlement.
- Case Name & Number: Thomas Hootselle, et al. v. Missouri Department of Corrections, Case No. t2A.C-CCoost8-ot, in the Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri
See Class Action Lawsuit review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Ocala, Florida, Illegal Fire Service Fees Common Fund Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits in-city utility customers who paid the city of Ocala’s fire service fee between Feb. 20, 2010, and July 21, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Ocala, Florida, Illegal Fire Service Fees Common Fund Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: July 1, 2023
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers who received notification from Humana that their personal and health information was compromised in a data breach occurring between Oct. 12 and Dec. 16, 2020.
- Case Name & Number: Discount Sleep of Ocala, LLC d/b/a Mattress Warehouse v. City of Ocala, Florida, Case No. 2014 CA 000426, in the Circuit Court of the 5th Judicial Circuit in and for Marion County, Florida
See Class Action Lawsuit review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits non-exempt employees of Vail Resorts Management Co. and worked primarily at one of its resort of mountain locations during an applicable class period. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: The settlement benefits non-exempt employees of Vail Resorts Management Co. and worked primarily at one of its resort of mountain locations during an applicable class period. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits non-exempt employees of Vail Resorts Management Co. and worked primarily at one of its resort of mountain locations during an applicable class period. Class periods vary depending on the state a Class Member worked in, as follows:
- For Class Members employed in Wyoming: Oct. 21, 2010, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in Indiana, Ohio, Washington, Minnesota, Vermont, New York, Michigan, Nevada, Wisconsin and Colorado: Oct. 21, 2014, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in Missouri: Oct. 21, 2015, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in California, Pennsylvania and Utah: Oct. 21, 2016, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in New Hampshire: Oct. 21, 2017, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members not employed in one of the above identified states: Oct. 21, 2016 to Oct. 23, 2021
- Case Name & Number: Hamilton v. Heavenly Valley, Limited Partnership, Case No. SC20210148, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of El Dorado
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
New Jersey Incarcerated Students with Disabilities IDEA Violations Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who were incarcerated in a New Jersey prison between Jan. 11, 2015, and Oct. 31, 2020 and met any of the following descriptions. You may be eligible for a potential award from the New Jersey Incarcerated Students with Disabilities IDEA Violations Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: January 31, 2024 (estimated)
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who were incarcerated in a New Jersey prison between Jan. 11, 2015, and Oct. 31, 2020 and met any of the following descriptions.
- Case Name & Number: Adam X. v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, Case No. 3:17-cv-00188-FLW-LHG, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
See Class Action Lawsuit review.
(Click here to file a claim)
FPI Management Fees Class Action Lawsuit
For Washington residents who got charged a tenant screening fee or holding fee by FPI Management between April 16, 2016, and Oct. 13, 2021, then you are eligible for a potential award from the FPI Management Fees Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Class Members are Washington state residents who sent in a rental application to FPI Management between April 16, 2016, and Oct. 13, 2021, and paid a tenant screening fee through FPI to the owner of the property, paid a holding deposit through FPI to the property owner, or had a credit report pulled by FPI or another entity acting on its behalf.
- Case Name & Number: Brianna Morris v. FPI Management Inc., Case. No. 2:19-CV-00128-TOR, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
See Class Action Lawsuit review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Raydon ERISA Class Action Lawsuit
For every U.S. citizen who was a participant in or beneficiary of the Raydon Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan on or after Sep. 30, 2015, then you are eligible for a potential award from the Raydon ERISA Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Every U.S. citizen who was a participant in or beneficiary of the Raydon Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan on or after Sep. 30, 2015
- Case Name & Number: Woznicki v. Raydon Corporation et al., Case No. 6:18-cv-02090-WWB-GJK, in the U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida Orlando Division
See Class Action Lawsuit review.
(Click here to file a claim)
McCormick All-Natural Products False Ad Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone in the United States, its territories, and districts who purchased certain McCormick all-natural products between Jan. 1, 2013, and Sept. 23, 2021. You are eligible for a potential award from the McCormick All-Natural Products False Ad Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: 90 days after the settlement receives final approval
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who purchased certain McCormick products labeled as “natural” or “all natural” between Jan. 1, 2013, and Sept. 23, 2021.
- Case Name & Number: Holve, et al. v. Mccormick & Co. Inc., Case No. 6:16-cv-06702 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
USAA Cost of Insurance Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who owns or owned Universal Life 1, Universal Life 2, Universal Life 3, and/or Universal Life 4 life insurance policies issued or administered by USAA Life, or its predecessors in interest, that were in force on or after March 1, 1999. You may be eligible for a potential award from the USAA Cost of Insurance Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who owns or owned Universal Life 1, Universal Life 2, Universal Life 3, and/or Universal Life 4 life insurance policies issued or administered by USAA Life, or its predecessors in interest, that were in force on or after March 1, 1999, subject to certain important exclusions. The estates of deceased individuals who would have been Class Members also are considered part of the Class.
- Case Name & Number: Spegele, et al. v. USAA Life Insurance Co., Case No. 5:17-cv-967-OLG in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Duke University and UNC Faculty Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit all natural persons employed as a faculty member by Duke University or UNC Chapel Hill from Oct. 1, 2001, through Feb. 5, 2018. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Duke University UNC Faculty Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: All natural persons employed by Duke University or UNC Chapel Hill from Oct. 1, 2001, through Feb. 5, 2018, as a faculty member.
- Case Name & Number: Binotti, et al. v. Duke University, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-470 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Neurobrands DL-Malic Acid Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit California residents who purchased the following Neurobrands products for household or personal use, not for resale, between Jan. 1, 2012, and Oct. 15, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Neurobrands DL-Malic Acid Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: California residents who purchased the following Neurobrands products for household or personal use, not for resale, between Jan. 1, 2012, and Oct. 15, 2020:
- NeuroSONIC Superfruit Infusion
- NeuroSONIC Orange Passion
- NeuroBLISS White Raspberry
- NeuroBLISS Citrus Berry
- NeuroBLISS Tropical Lychee
- NeuroPROTEIN Watermelon Mint
- NeuroPROTEIN Cherry Vanilla
- NeuroDAILY Tangerine Citrus
- NeuroGASM Passion Fruit
- Case Name & Number: Young, et al. v. Neurobrands LLC, Case No. 4:18-cv-05907-JSW in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Intelenet America OT Wages Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who worked for Intelenet America LLC, now known as Teleperformance Business Services US LLC as an hourly home-based call center worker, including, but not limited to, agents, associates, call center representatives, and travel care professionals, at any point between Sept. 20, 2015, and June 21, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Intelenet America OT Wages Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible:
- The Class is defined as anyone who worked for Intelenet America LLC, now known as Teleperformance Business Services US LLC as an hourly home-based call center worker, including, but not limited to, agents, associates, call center representatives, and travel care professionals, at any point between Sept. 20, 2015, and June 21, 2021, or as an hourly call center worker in a brick-and-mortar call center, including, but not limited to agents, associates, call center representatives, and travel care professionals, at any point between Jan. 27, 2017, and June 21, 2021.
- The settlement definition of “At-Home Workers” does not include call center workers who work or worked from home temporarily or permanently due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the settlement’s definition of “Brick-And-Mortar Workers” does include call center workers who worked from home temporarily or permanently due to COVID-19.
- Case Name & Number: Jasmine C., et al. v. Intelenet America LLC, Case No. 2:18-cv-14052-MCA-JAD in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Robert Heath Trucking Wages Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who is or was previously employed by Robert Heath Trucking in California as a truck driver and was paid piece rate by the mile between Aug. 30, 2015, and Sept. 1, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Robert Heath Trucking Wages Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who is or was previously employed by Robert Heath Trucking in California as a truck driver and was paid piece rate by the mile between Aug. 30, 2015, and Sept. 1, 2020
- Case Name & Number: Dianne S., et al. v. Robert Heath Trucking Inc., Case No. 19STCV30808 in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Brenntag Profit Sharing Plan Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who participated in the plan at any point between Jan. 8, 2014, and April 8, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Brenntag Profit Sharing Plan Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who participated in the plan at any point between Jan. 8, 2014, and April 8, 2021 (the Class Period), including any beneficiary of a deceased person who participated in the plan at any time during that period and any alternate payee of a person subject to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order who participated in the plan at any point during that period.
- Case Name & Number: Buescher et. al v. Brenntag, et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-00147-JMG in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
IBM 401(k) Plan Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who was a participant in or beneficiary of the IBM 401(k) Plus Plan at any time from January 21, 2014, through October 20, 2014. You may be eligible for a potential award from the IBM 401(k) Plan Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who was a participant in or beneficiary of the IBM 401(k) Plus Plan at any time from Jan. 21, 2014, through Oct. 20, 2014, and whose plan accounts included investments in the IBM Stock Fund.
- Case Name & Number: Larry J., et al. v. Retirement Plans Committee of IBM, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-03781-WHP in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Wells Fargo Buydown Agreement Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit all residents of the United States who entered into buydown agreements with Wells Fargo in residential real estate mortgage transactions. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Wells Fargo Buydown Agreement Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: none
- Who’s Eligible: Two classes
- TILA Class: Anyone in the United States who entered into buydown agreements with Wells Fargo in residential real estate mortgage transactions within one year prior to the filing of the initial complaint.
- Breach of Contract Class: Anyone in the United States who, during the Class Period, entered into buydown agreements with Wells Fargo in residential real estate mortgage transactions.
- Case Name & Number: Alejandro Carrillo, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 2:18-cv-03095-SJF-SIL in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Creative Ceilings Settles Wage Statement Class Action Lawsuit
For current and former Creative Ceilings Inc. employees in California who worked one or more pay periods between Dec. 20, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2020, you are eligible for a potential award from the Creative Ceilings Settles Wage Statement Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: N/A
- Who’s Eligible: Current and former Creative Ceilings Inc. employees in California who worked one or more pay periods between Dec. 20, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2020.
- Case Name & Number: Hector S., et al. v. Creative Ceilings Inc., et al., Case No. MSC19-02678 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Contra Costa
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Terminix Alabama Price Increase Class Action Lawsuit
For individuals who were former and existing Terminix customers in Alabama who own a Terminix-serviced property, then you are eligible for a potential award from the Terminix Alabama Price Increase Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: There is no claim form deadline; however, the settlement fund will expire 12/01/2022.
- Who’s Eligible: Former and existing Terminix customers in Alabama
- Case Name & Number: State of Alabama v. The Terminix International Co. LP, et al., Case No. CV-2020-901368 in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Seterus Alleged Unlawful Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit
For homeowners in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania who received notices of debt and possible acceleration on their mortgage loans from Seterus, you are eligible for a potential award from the Seterus Alleged Unlawful Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: N/A
- Who’s Eligible: Homeowners in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania who received notices of debt and possible acceleration on their mortgage loans from Seterus between the applicable dates in each state.
- Case Name & Number: Koepplinger v. Seterus Inc., Case No. 1:17-cv-00995 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
See Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Trojan Horse Retirement Plan Class Action Lawsuit
If you signed up for a 401(k) plan with Trojan Horse from Jan. 1, 2011 through Sept. 20, 2016 and fear that you and your loved ones may be taken advantage of, you are eligible for a potential award from the Trojan Horse Retirement Plan Class Action Lawsuit.
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Estimated Amount: Varies
- Case Name & Number: Longo, et al. v. Trojan Horse Ltd., et al., Case No. 5:13-cv-00418-BO, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
See our Class Action Lawsuit Review .
(Click the link above to file your claim)
Missouri Timeshare Closing Costs Lawsuit
For individuals that purchased a timeshare from Resort Sales Missouri Inc. or Spinnaker Resorts Inc on or after June 1, 2014, you are eligible for a potential award.
- Claim Form Deadline: The deadline to file a claim is 30 days after receiving a notice in the mail
- Estimated Amount: Varies, depending on the closing costs paid.
- Case Name & Number: Darrell and Kathleen Thompson v. Resort Sales Missouri Inc. and Spinnaker Resorts Inc., Case No. 1746-CC00203, in the Circuit Court of Taney County, Missouri
See our Class Action Lawsuit Review
(Click the link above to file your claim)
Bottom Line
If you qualify for any of these class action lawsuit settlements, this is a great way to earn some extra cash and become reimbursed.
There are many class action lawsuit settlements available up to date, but these are generally available to the public and require no proof of purchase.
If you’re interested in more class action lawsuit settlements, see our full list of the Review.
Did you know you can earn free money from banks? Below are a few of the best banks offering the best bonuses:
- Huntington Bank Promotions
- Chase Bank Promotions
- TD Bank Promotions
- Discover Bank Promotions
- HSBC Bank Promotions
- CIT Bank Promotions
- For more of a variety, see our list of 1,000+ bank bonuses!
AccountThe post No Proof Required Class Action Lawsuit Settlements – April 2023 appeared first on Hustler Money Blog.